![]() |
The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
*** WARNING *** viewer discretion is advised - contains explicit violence.
http://www.veoh.com/videos/v4465197bMdPzx6?confirm ed=1 <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p> <o:p>This footage is of Canadian Snipers shooting terrorists in Afghanistan with a .50-cal rifle with a range just a little over 1-mile !!!</o:p> <o:p></o:p> <o:p>(let's try this again......without politics please)</o:p> |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Very dramatic. 100% fake, but very dramatic none the less.
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
I spoke with a sniper instructor at a gun range who referrenced me to the above video. Hardly think it's fake...... Have you seen what a .50 cal does to targets ?!? :rolleyes_m: |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Living next to a Canadian military base for the last 30 years ... yes, I have. And I know for a fact that bodies don't go flying off into the air as demonstrated by the first shot on that footage. I have, however, seen very similar footage attributed to a few people using them against prairie dogs.
http://www.dogbegone.com/ |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Something does seem odd about that. It's like they are not shooting at humans but some kind of props or something. But then again, I've never shot anyone with a 50 caliber
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
Checkout the ballistics and this is on a 'standard round' : <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 border=1><TBODY><TR><TH class=rc>Muzzle Velocity</TH><TD>2,800 fps (853 mps)</TD></TR><TR><TH class=rc>Muzzle Energy</TH><TD>11,500 foot-pounds (15,582 J)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/i...ifle/M107.html My 44-cal revolver will knock a full grown man on his butt with 1-shot and my muzzle energy is only about 1100 ft lbs. We're talking about a 'whopping' 11,500 ft lbs. or 10x that of a .44-Magnum !!!!!!! Good grief - of course a human could fly up in the air. :banghead: |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. I've seen a 50lbs sandbag get knocked over. It didn't fly. It also contained the round. A human body couldn't contain the energy required to loft it into the air. You'd get penetration (say it with me now: Pen - E - Tration), not a flying corpse.
You claim a mile range. Yet the target is indistinct ... and the debris cloud is visible. Conversation over. If you want to delude yourself in the face of the obvious, knock yourself out. I'll leave everyone else to view both videos and make their own decisions. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
We'll see what the other GIM'ers think as well......the jury is still out on this one, Professor. :bear_tongue: |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
:haha: |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
I say the video is faked. Never seen or heard of anything warm-blooded hit with a high power round that did not explode or at least fragment on impact. See prarie dog videos.
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
The video in itself is not fake. However those are not humans being shot nor are they shooting .50. Those are small mammals being blown away by .223 or .17 caliber rifles.
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
That's what I meant...not people...not a fifty
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Any volunteers?
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
You do know that you can take any .44 Magnum and load it with a slow .44 special round called a 'cowboy load'........ 1100 ft lbs ? .......nope ~ try about 300 tops and a glancing blow at that with the angle he used. :thumpdown My video is a curiosity as well, because nobody can confirm what happened and what rifle / cal was used.......50-cal is the 'claim' and we can argue this to infinity. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
Granted, I'm not aware of any body armor that can stop a 50cal and I can't attest to the accuracy of the video, but that man has proven that a 44mag won't put him on his butt. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Here's some more info on the 'Taliban Sniper' video :
.50 cal Barrett M82A Sniper Rifle with explosive tipped Rufus rounds Didn't do a search yet to find out if these rounds exist - any info ? |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
Also, I found this.......kinda interesting - soldier falls down but I'm not sure if it's the round or a 'reaction' as being argued here. "Body Armor" http://www.grunt.com/downloads/bodyarmor.wmv AIF Shooting at Snake 3 and Saber 3 |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
AD,
Unfortunately, I've gotta go with Prof on this one. It's NOT humans being shot. Definately little 'furry' animals. DEFINATELY shot at long range. BUT NOT with a fifty cal. I got this vid about three years ago and it was labeled the same way. With a short discussion with my buddy, currently in Germany, but at the time in 'The Sand' he said that one made all the rounds at his FOB and everyone agreed. NOT A HUMAN BODY being shot. And he also agreed NOT a fifty cal. Sorry bud. But it's still pretty spectacular none the less. This last one is AT LEAST a thirty cal. Could be a fifty, but the rpm's sound way too high for a fifty. BUT, note NOTHING flys into the air. Well, OK, the hood of the larger truck kinda 'flys off' but that's about it. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Damn prairie dogs.........had me goin' there too for a while......crapola
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Could the sniper be using a HE round?
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Sorry, but that video is of someone shooting Marmots:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmot It is constantly put forward as being of sniper action in Afghanistan, which is of course totally false. Here's what happens when someone stationary is shot with a high calibre: (Viewer discretion advised. This video contains death): http://www.viperalley.com/gallery/up..._wanna_be_.wmv |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Not sure how many here have seen the show, Mythbusters, but just a week or two ago there was an episode where they covered this very subject. They rigged up a pig (closest thing that can really get to a human cadaver) on a rack so that it would fall of with the very slightest touch/push, and then shot several different rounds at it (can't remember all of them, but .223, .308, .44mag, 9mm, .357mag I think were all done). At one point that had three guys firing full auto at the pig at the same time. The only thing that even got it to fall off the rack was 00 buck from a 12 gauge (or was it a slug? again, can't remember), and it didn't fly back at all... just barely fell off the rack. Since the rounds were mostly going right through the pig, all that energy passes right through, so they repeated with a bulletproof vest on the pig, to get basically the same results. Actually, I think it was then that the shotty finally barely knocked the pig off the rack, not until after the vest was on, stopping the rounds, letting them transfer their energy to the pig rather than through it.
Of course they mentioned that pesky Newton's third law, like in the video posted earlier in this thread. And regarding that video of the Barrett 50 cal... my goodness I can't stand that narrator/host. I think that show is called Future Weapons. I just can't take his whispering, let me tell you a secret tone through the ENTIRE thing. Then he says the .308 is what AK-47s fire. And then he says it can take 15-20 seconds on a bolt action to open bolt, load round into chamber, and close bolt. :smokin: Ah well, the Barrett sure seems nifty. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
If a .17HMR can eviscerate a praire dog, why isn't it possible for a .50BMG cartridge loaded to deliver up to 20,000 joules of energy to do the same to a human? A friend of mine who was in the marines said an M2 does that if it hits a human, I believe him.
Aren't these shots from underneath the target and on the side of a mountain as well? I wonder what sort of satisfaction people get from calling bullshit on entertaining videos, I've never really understood it. |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
I don't think people are trying to rain on anyone's parade, but just to set the record straight (bust the myth? :bear_tongue:) that shooting someone, even with a good-sized caliber, isn't going to make them fly five feet backwards, like in the movies.
I like the shots at 0:43 and 4:30 in this clip from the movie "Open Range" (pretty good western, by the way :D). <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lq3zjTmVLbM"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lq3zjTmVLbM" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object> |
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
Quote:
|
Re: The Effects of being shot by a .50-cal
FID,
One buddy of mine said 20mm chain gun. Which it COULD be. But the cyclic rate of fire is definately higher than ANY 50 cal I've ever shot, and I've shot a few. But could also be the 30mm as well. Hard to say. DEFINATELY not a weapon you want to be on the receiving end of, for sure.:shocked_ma: |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM